nanog mailing list archives
RE: /24s run amuck
From: "Michael Hallgren" <m.hallgren () free fr>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:58:39 +0100
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:and that a large driver is to make your network look larger than it is...What audience??Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(
Wonderful... mh
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- /24s run amuck Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 10)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Vadim Antonov (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck John Palmer (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Daniel Golding (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 13)
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 17)