nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along)
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:52:32 +0100
* alex () nac net (Alex Rubenstein) [Tue 24 Feb 2004, 18:13 CET]:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5163931.html?tag=nefd_top A Level 3 spokesman would not confirm or deny that hardware was the source of the problem, nor would he elaborate on the nature of the issue.And we, the general Internet public, tends to just accept this and forget about it. Why do we do this?
I can't speak for others, but in my case it's because I'm not a customer. -- Niels. -- Today's subliminal thought is:
Current thread:
- RE: possible L3 issues, (continued)
- RE: possible L3 issues Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 23)
- Re: possible L3 issues Gary E. Miller (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Chris Ranch (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Sean Crandall (Feb 23)
- Re: possible L3 issues Scott Francis (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues kwallace (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Arjan Lugtenberg (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Erik Haagsman (Feb 24)
- Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Alex Rubenstein (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Niels Bakker (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Colin Neeson (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Pete Templin (Feb 25)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 25)
- RE: possible L3 issues Erik Haagsman (Feb 24)