nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along)
From: Colin Neeson <colin () oriel com au>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:45:14 +1100
Because, in the the grand scale scheme of things, it's really not that important.
No one died because of it, the normal, everyday events of the world went on,
unaffected by a Level 3 outage...Might be nice to know what happened, but my life will certainly not be less interesting by not having that knowledge...
-colin. On 25 Feb 2004, at 4:13 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
And we, the general Internet public, tends to just accept this and forgetabout it. Why do we do this?
Current thread:
- Re: possible L3 issues, (continued)
- Re: possible L3 issues Gary E. Miller (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Chris Ranch (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Sean Crandall (Feb 23)
- Re: possible L3 issues Scott Francis (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues kwallace (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Arjan Lugtenberg (Feb 23)
- RE: possible L3 issues Erik Haagsman (Feb 24)
- Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Alex Rubenstein (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Niels Bakker (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Colin Neeson (Feb 24)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Pete Templin (Feb 25)
- Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 25)
- RE: possible L3 issues Erik Haagsman (Feb 24)