nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)
From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:37:05 -0400
On Apr 19, 2004, at 4:10 AM, Michael Painter wrote:
First time user of the "net" in '87 when CompuServe announced it to its denizens.Thank [deity] for Micro$oft or we'd have to get a real job.
I hear this a lot and it is such BS. Does anyone here HONESTLY believe the "computer revolution" was caused by MS alone and would never have happened without them?
Microsoft *might* have made it happen slightly faster than without them, but a good argument can be made that MS actually set back the software industry in many ways, from stifling competition & innovation to the current mess with uneducated users and a homogeneous OS.
The truth is, we will not know if things are better or worse because of MS. But it is no _no way_ a slam dunk one way or the other.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Rodney Joffe (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brandon Shiers (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Henry Yen (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Michael Painter (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Paul Vixie (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) John Kristoff (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Chris Brenton (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brian Russo (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Chris Brenton (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brian Russo (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet (Apr 19)
- RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Geo. (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Alexei Roudnev (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 19)