nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)
From: "Brandon Shiers" <brandons () wyoming com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:40:14 -0600
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:16:36 -0400 (EDT) Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:
Should ISPs start requiring their users to install Windows XP SP2?
IMHO:Not if they want to stay in business. Our customer base is probably 80%Win 9x users. I can't speak for everybody else, but I would be willing to bet that a majority of ISP's have a good chunk of their customer base running Win 9x-based operating systems. If the ISP I work for was to make a minimum system requirement like that, we'd go out of business overnight. We don't even use Windows XP on our corporate LAN yet -- we're still running Win2K SP4. Let's face it -- this shouldn't have to be the ISP's problem. Microsoft needs to quit rushing out new OS releases without properly straining them and stress testing to find as many holes as they can. They need to start cracking down on themselves and really start worrying about securing their OS and patching it as much as possible before throwing it to market. I understand that they won't find EVERY possible hole, but the last few years, as far as bugs in their software goes, they have an extremely poor track record. Since about the NT4 days, it's been horrible. Service pack after service pack, etc. We have our machines setup to autotmatically tell us when new updates are available. It's pretty disheartening when you install 4 patches one day, and then 2 days later you have to go through installing another 3 - 4 patches just to ensure your machine is keeping updated with patches to fix their shoddy software.
--Brandon
Current thread:
- Fingerprints (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT), (continued)
- Fingerprints (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Jerry Eyers (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Lou Katz (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Rodney Joffe (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 18)
- Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brandon Shiers (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Henry Yen (Apr 18)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Michael Painter (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Paul Vixie (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) John Kristoff (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Chris Brenton (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Brian Russo (Apr 19)
- Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) Chris Brenton (Apr 19)