nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:59:33 +0300
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
No, it goes with the subject, lazy people run systems which donĀ“t check if they got the same message twice.p.s. Please do not cc me on replies to the list. Please reply to the list only, or to me only (as you prefer) but not to both.Maybe the list should add a reply-to? Or am I starting another flamewar here?
Might even reduce spam :-) Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Adrian Chadd (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators joshua sahala (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Chris Palmer (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)