nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:18:10 +0100
Not everyone wants to (or is able to) entrust their email to a a Tier 1 ISP; if nothing else, the Tier 1s would charge for the privilege.
A tier 1 provider in the SMTP mesh does not have to be the same thing as a tier 1 provider in the physical mesh. See the structure of the NNTP mesh over the years for examples. I fully expect to see specialized email peering providers arise who will have SMTP peering arrangements with the large email site like AOL, Yahoo, Hotmail etc. and who then arrange peering with large numbers of smaller sites who either cannot find SMTP peering locally or who want to be assured of alternate SMTP routes in the event their main peer cannot reach all destinations. Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Routing issues, (continued)
- Re: Routing issues Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Apr 14)
- Re: Routing issues Nick Feamster (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric Brunner-Williams (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric Brunner-Williams (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Rob Nelson (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Adrian Chadd (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)