nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: JC Dill <nanog () vo cnchost com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:45:40 -0700
At 12:33 AM 4/14/2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I understand your frustration, but the approach of blocking port 25 isn't the right one. It may be convenient for you, but ...
Dood, this *exact* argument was made ~10 years ago against closing open relays. So, do you think that everyone should just open their servers to relaying for anyone, since closing all the open relays has proven to be inconvenient for some, and not a 100% effective solution?
jc --p.s. Please do not cc me on replies to the list. Please reply to the list only, or to me only (as you prefer) but not to both.
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Rob Nelson (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Adrian Chadd (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Todd Vierling (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators joshua sahala (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Chris Palmer (Apr 13)