nanog mailing list archives
RE: Worst design decisions?
From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
Who needs a console port on a Bay? Site angler will save the day!
Get it right! Site Mangler! What fond memories...
... Err, sorry, coming off of a power outage with nothing to do but drink coffee. -e -----Original Message----- From: Peter E. Fry [mailto:pfry () swbell net] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Worst design decisions? David Barak wrote:Personally my issues are console-cable related: is there a benefit to the HUGE variety of console pinouts used by the various hardware vendors? Just look at vendor C as an example [...]Is that the best example you can come up with? Ever use any Bay equipment...? Heh. Makes me want to add "I hate it when that happens", as in "Ever put your head in a vise and crank it down real tight...?" Peter E. Fry
Current thread:
- Re: Worst design decisions?, (continued)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Luke Starrett (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Charles Sprickman (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Nathan Eric Norman (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Charles Sprickman (Sep 18)
- Re: Worst design decisions? Damian Gerow (Sep 19)
- RE: Worst design decisions? Scott Granados (Sep 19)
- Re: Worst design decisions? steve uurtamo (Sep 19)