nanog mailing list archives

RE: Worst design decisions?


From: "Austad, Jay" <JAustad () temgweb com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:19:20 -0500


Sun Ultra Enterprise 3500.  Three power supplies for redundancy, only *one*
power cord.  You'd think that with something that originally cost 6 figures,
that this would have been thought out a bit more.

Oh, and 1U patch panels with only 12 ports in them annoy me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt [mailto:acheron () qwest net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:43 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Worst design decisions?



Hello all,

Was doing some upgrades on a UBR7246 (to a VXR), and I got to 
thinking 
about short sighted design considerations.  I was curious if 
any of you 
had some pet peeves from a design perspective to rant about.  
I'll start 
with a couple.

1) Why did Cisco design the I/O controller on the 7246 with screws in 
the corner, which are very difficult to get at?  And worse than that, 
why did they not include a cheap handle on the blank in this slot?

2) Why did Cisco not include side handles on the 12000 
chassis?  It's a 
heavy chassis, and I can imagine how many techs have thrown out their 
back moving that chassis around.

I've got a couple others in my head from 3Com and a couple of others, 
but I thought I'd get the ball rolling.  So, what do you think?




Current thread: