nanog mailing list archives
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist
From: Avleen Vig <lists-nanog () silverwraith com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:46:37 -0700
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:01:48PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
What you're missing in my argument is that it doesn't matter. I have no idea who Eddy Marin is, nor do I care. Blocking wcg's corporate mail servers is not the solution. Sure, it may get someone's attention at wcg, but it may also harm a lot of "innocent" communications, sales talking to clients, other wiltel customers requesting support, heck, the secretary ordering lunch to be delivered.
Your first statement isn't true. Of course you care. If you didn't care who was spamming, you wouldn't be using a DNSBL to block them. By using a BL to block spammers, you are saying you don't want to receive spam. The terms of use are known and clearly listed on each BL's site. You should have known that SBL would do this in extreme cases, if you chose to use them.
Current thread:
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist, (continued)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist alex (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Gary E. Miller (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Scott Granados (Sep 24)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Andy Walden (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Eliot Lear (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Dan Hollis (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Avleen Vig (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Sep 25)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Hank Nussbacher (Sep 25)
- Re[3]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Sep 25)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Sep 25)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Susan Harris (Sep 25)