nanog mailing list archives
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist
From: "Scott Granados" <scott () wworks net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:28:52 -0700
Even though this is off topic, I'd have to say that this seems very odd from SpamHaus. They never seemed to isolate entire ranges but seemed more specific. I can also say they were very fast to remove issues once the spammers were removed and were also quite helpful. I wonder does this strategy demonstrate some sort of change or is it just a one off? ----- Original Message ----- From: <alex () pilosoft com> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:14 PM Subject: Re: williams spamhaus blacklist
Maybe I've missed something but since when did spamhaus become vengeance oriented? All we try to do is eliminate as much spam as we can using a wide variety of blacklists at the same time.The moment they started blacklisting IPs that never sent spam. (AKA williams corporate mail servers). -alex
Current thread:
- williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist alex (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist alex (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Gary E. Miller (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Scott Granados (Sep 24)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Andy Walden (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Eliot Lear (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Dan Hollis (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Avleen Vig (Sep 24)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Sep 25)
- Re: williams spamhaus blacklist alex (Sep 24)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Hank Nussbacher (Sep 25)
- Re[3]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Sep 25)
- Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Sep 25)