nanog mailing list archives
Re: Site Finder
From: Jason Slagle <raistlin () tacorp net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:03:43 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Kee Hinckley wrote:
Verisign is trying to move this argument into a question of what best serves the end-user. They are doing this because the public understands that, and because they know they can't win the question of what best serves the infrastructure providers. We're the ones who have to pay to make changes to deal with things they break.
Hrm. Perhaps the way to answer that question is to figure out how much cost of the extra mail processing etc is going to increase end user costs. Ask the user "Are you willing to pay your ISP $1 more a month to deal with verisign not dealing with the technical issues?" I suspect the answer is a strong no. Jason -- Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .
Current thread:
- Site Finder Ray Bellis (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Kee Hinckley (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jason Slagle (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Geo. (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder E.B. Dreger (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Michael Moscovitch (Oct 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Site Finder Robert Boyle (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Michael Moscovitch (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jared Mauch (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Will Yardley (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Kee Hinckley (Oct 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Site Finder Dan Lockwood (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Site Finder Jack Bates (Oct 18)
- RE: Site Finder Owen DeLong (Oct 18)