nanog mailing list archives
Re: News coverage, Verisign etc.
From: up () 3 am
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
In these days of corporate malfeasance scandal coverage, you'd think that Verisign's tactics would have whetted the appetite of some bright investigative reporter for one of the major publications. On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I have gotten a reasoned response from the technology editor of the Washington Post, and we are discussing things. While I wouldn't have done it that way, he had a rational explanation of why the story was written the way it was, and definitely indicating there will be continuing coverage of the issue. He believes there's always room for improving coverage.
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up () 3 am http://3.am =========================================================================
Current thread:
- News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Eliot Lear (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. up (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Mike Tancsa (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Robert A. Hayden (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Owen DeLong (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Dave Crocker (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Owen DeLong (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Curtis Maurand (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Mike Tancsa (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Eliot Lear (Oct 08)