nanog mailing list archives
News coverage, Verisign etc.
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () gettcomm com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:19:32 -0400
I have gotten a reasoned response from the technology editor of the Washington Post, and we are discussing things. While I wouldn't have done it that way, he had a rational explanation of why the story was written the way it was, and definitely indicating there will be continuing coverage of the issue. He believes there's always room for improving coverage.
Current thread:
- News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Eliot Lear (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. up (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Mike Tancsa (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Robert A. Hayden (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Owen DeLong (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Dave Crocker (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Mike Tancsa (Oct 08)
- Re: News coverage, Verisign etc. Eliot Lear (Oct 08)