Re: CCO/cisco.com issues.

[ed () the7thbeer com]

> > Anyone who doesn't think that's an operational issue, just wait until it
> > bites you on the ass.
>
> Now we have clear evidence that there are no less than three who
> understand the threat.

My first thought was that the DDoS was a means of obscuring access to
patches for other vulnerabilities that might be simulatenously exploited.
I'm assuming, though not certain, that Cisco would have alternative
distribution/communication/update channels in such an event, but is that
indeed the case?

 -ed
-----------------
ed () the7thbeer com