nanog mailing list archives
Re: NOAA warning for rf communications
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. wrote: : Well, this is more than you really wanted to know, but.... : HF High 3mhz-30mhz I realize this. However, satellite communications (which were mentioned in the notice) are certainly not in the HF band. I suppose I then interpreted the NOAA notice such that "high frequency" was being used as a generic term, not indicative of the band. Oh well, back to running a network. <yawn> -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com>
Current thread:
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications, (continued)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Roy (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications ed (Oct 24)
- RE: NOAA warning for rf communications Kevin Bednar (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Rodney Joffe (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Anton L. Kapela (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Roy (Oct 23)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Marshall Eubanks (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Eric Kuhnke (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Scott Granados (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Scott Granados (Oct 27)