nanog mailing list archives
Re: NOAA warning for rf communications
From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Wouldn't 2.4 ghz fall in that range or does hf mean hf in the classical sense of something on the scale of 3 to 49 mhz or so. On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Roy wrote:
According to the notice "Satellite and other spacecraft operations, power systems, high frequency communications, and navigation systems may experience disruptions over this two-week period." I think you will find that 802.11b and other terrestrial microwave LOS links don't meet any of those criteria and should be unaffected. Some small increase in the noise level may be detected. Chris Yarnell wrote:my office experienced 802.11b weirdness (sudden bouts of 0% signal for no apparent reason) earlier this week. i'm fully expecting more tomorrow. :)There is a high likelihood that things like 802.11, licensed and unlicensed microwave links, and certainly satellite links will sustain interference over the next few days. I assume that everyone on the list is both aware, and prepared ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications, (continued)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications ed (Oct 24)
- RE: NOAA warning for rf communications Kevin Bednar (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Rodney Joffe (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Anton L. Kapela (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Marshall Eubanks (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Eric Kuhnke (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Todd Vierling (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Scott Granados (Oct 24)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: NOAA warning for rf communications Scott Granados (Oct 27)