nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:27:28 -0500
Stephen J. Wilcox writes on 11/14/2003 7:16 AM:
So anyway, was discussing the cidr report at the last nanog.. I was pointing out that deaggregation is discouraged by the naming and shaming and then someone else pointed out that this list has scarcely altered in months.So, what can we do as the operator community if this report isnt having the desired effect?
Stop accepting /24 type routes? -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Nov 07)
- Re: The Cidr Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 07)
- Re: The Cidr Report william (Nov 07)
- Re: The Cidr Report Adam Debus (Nov 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 07)
- Re: The Cidr Report Joe Abley (Nov 14)