nanog mailing list archives
Re: This may be stupid but..
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Now, the problem of finding a good recruiter is substituted for the problem of finding a good engineer :) The trade-off is good only if you're planning to hire dozens of engineers, considering monetary costs of such arrangement. Even better, if you're creating a large org, get a headhunter on board, and give him stock options - otherwise he has wrong incentives (i.e. he's better off with job-hopping "upward mobility" type of guys (the more expensive, the better) when he works for himself, and you really want smart and trainable staff and don't give a damn about perfect resume - and he's going to be cost-conscious). --vadim On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andy Walden wrote:
Again, as with most things, there tends to be two ends to the spectrum.
Current thread:
- This may be stupid but.. Fisher, Shawn (Nov 08)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. John Brown (CV) (Nov 08)
- Re[2]: This may be stupid but.. Richard Welty (Nov 08)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Vadim Antonov (Nov 08)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 08)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Richard Irving (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Andy Walden (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Vadim Antonov (Nov 10)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Doug Luce (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. neal rauhauser (Nov 11)
- Re: This may be stupid but. Doug Luce (Nov 11)
- Re: This may be stupid but. neal rauhauser (Nov 11)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. John Brown (CV) (Nov 08)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Peter Galbavy (Nov 10)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Petri Helenius (Nov 09)
- RE: This may be stupid but.. John Ferriby (Nov 09)
- Re: This may be stupid but.. Timothy Brown (Nov 10)