nanog mailing list archives
Re: North America not interested in IP V6
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:07:18 +0100 (BST)
Hi Marcel, I tried 12.2(?)T last year and had problems, I put that down to problems in the 12.2T IOS tho not specific to v6. I'm currently running 12.2S on ao couple routers, ipv6 is not enabled yet but the IOS's have behaved well so far... the next step is to check it with ipv6 on Steve On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcel Lemmen wrote:
Well, now we are talking about IPv6, I can ask a question right here ;) Does anyone have any experiences with the Cisco IPv6 IOS (T or S releases)? Can be either good or bad experiences. I heard there were some issues (router freezes etc) with the T releases... Have to convince the management :) With kind regards, Marcel Lemmen Support Net - Partner in Managed Internet Solutions --= Try http://alt.binaries.nl =-- --- The previous message was something like this: --- !>Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +0200 !>From: Alexander Koch <koch () tiscali net> !>To: Neil J. McRae <neil () DOMINO ORG> !>Cc: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold () nipper de>, !> Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>, Roy <garlic () garlic com>, !> nanog () merit edu !>Subject: Re: North America not interested in IP V6 !> !> !>Neil, all, !> !>On Wed, 30 July 2003 11:58:34 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote: !>> > Here at DE-CIX (www.de-cix.net) I can see that more and more ISP are joining !>> > the IPv6 trial (http://www.de-cix.net/info/decix-ipv6/) . Currently already !>> > 20% of all ~120 ISP at DE-CIX have IPv6 enabled. !>> !>> I'd be more interested in seeing how many customer connections !>> are using IPV6. !> !>in fact we (Tiscali) have three customers in Europe that !>have their own /32 and are running v6 in parallel to v4, and !>we do transit for them. I do not like that 'full table !>everywhere' thing at all which is stil way too common in !>Europe, it does not help pushing v6. !> !>Regards, !>Alexander !> !>(AS-TISCALI-V6PEERS for whom it may concern) !>
Current thread:
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6, (continued)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Daryl G. Jurbala (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Simon Lyall (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Daryl G. Jurbala (Jul 29)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 St. Clair, James (Jul 29)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Ben Buxton (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Neil J. McRae (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Alexander Koch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Neil J. McRae (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Marcel Lemmen (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeremy T. Bouse (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Jared Mauch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Alexander Koch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Ronald van der Pol (Jul 31)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 31)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Ronald van der Pol (Jul 31)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 31)