RE: North America not interested in IP V6

["St. Clair, James" <JStClair () vredenburg com>]

Please somebody correct me..Can't a provider simply NAT the IPv4 at his
gateway, and stream IPv6 to as many wireless customers as he can lock into a
painful long-term contract? (just kidding!)

The demand for /8's won't change any, and you can IPv6 and eat your cake
too. I do understand the v4 to v6 NAT'ing may be an issue...

-----Original Message-----
From: Daryl G. Jurbala [mailto:daryl () introspect net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:41 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: North America not interested in IP V6



> The reference to 70% of people in Europe having a web enabled 
> phone made me laugh too...  although I guess it could be true 
> - my last 3 mobile phones have all had WAP capability, but I 
> don't know of anyone that actually uses this feature.

I actually use mine.  But it's behind a proxy, as I suspect nearly every
other provder's WAP gateway is.

Daryl Jurbala