nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP to doom us all

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:58:39 -0800

I think the only problem with the comments is that they
over-estimate the benefit of that level of security relative
to the overhead it requires.


crypto hardware has become cheap.

randy

Current thread:

Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- - - Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)
  - Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
  - Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
    - Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
    - RE: BGP to doom us all Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 28)
    - Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Feb 28)
  - Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Robertson (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
  - Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
    - Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
    - Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
    - Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Jim Deleskie (Feb 28)
  - Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)