nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP to doom us all
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:24:58 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jim Deleskie wrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed Seems the BGP will be the down fall of the internet, the sky is falling the sky is falling
Other than pending patents and a cool name Secure BGP, you still have the fundamental problem. Garbage In, Garbage Out. The only difference is now you have Secure Garbage(tm). There is a problem that needs to be solved. But like the whole micro-payments, SET, etc thing; if the solution is more complicated and more expensive than the alternatives; it won't get used no matter how "secure" it is.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all alex (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Robertson (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)