nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP to doom us all
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:59:03 -0800
http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed
actually, the article is not all that far off reality as i see it. the exception being that the ietf has NOT been diligently pursuing sBGP but rather a lot of the effort is going into a 3/4 hack being pushed by vendor laziness. randy
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all alex (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Rob Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Robertson (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)