nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX
From: Steve Feldman <feldman () twincreeks net>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 07:21:46 -0800
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not any private point-to-point circuits between providers through the same facility.But if we're going to compare this to MAE Gigaswitch failures, shouldn't we be talking apples to apples and oranges to oranges?
In this case, the MAE was a banana: Worldcom always officially discouraged private interconnects among colocated routers. Steve
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 16)
- Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Steve Feldman (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Jesper Skriver (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 18)