nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:19:32 +0200
That medium only works for large audiences. It does not address geographically- While we're on the topic of local video, what happens whentelevision migrates to IP networks?Why should it? There's a cheap, ubiquitous, widely deployed broadcasting medium already. I never understood network integration for the sake of network integration.
large sparse audiences at all.
Live events and interactive show's are not. In some cases you start to suffer if yourIn any case, TV (of all things) does not have problems with latency or jitter below 10s of seconds. All TV content is pre-packaged.
latency goes to multiple-seconds range. That's quite rare anyway, >500msnetwork latency is quite rare and add few hundred codec and de-jitter latency and
you'll find that excessive jitter is your enemy, not the latency itself. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Stephen Stuart (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 16)
- Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Steve Feldman (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Jesper Skriver (Nov 17)