Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:13:11 PDT, kevin graham said:
> Given the bellowing over some of the allocations in 24/8 that have been
> heard here before, it would seem to be welcome. Sticking large numbers
> of unadministered, always-on boxes that aren't supposed to be running
> inbound services in unrouted space would save all of us headaches.

That's almost a better justification for NAT than address-space conservation. ;)

Attachment: _bin
Description: