nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 00:11:25 -0700
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:44:28PM -0700, simon () higgs com said:
At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell phone needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My current phone does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of analog-type services?
*grin* Mine runs ssh too. :) I just wish I had time/talent enough to hack it to do key-based auth and ssh v2. Note my use of the phrase 'average customer' though. Readers of this list probably do not qualify as such.
Best Regards, Simon
-- Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?, (continued)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Simon Higgs (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Dan Hollis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Avleen Vig (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? John Kristoff (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)