nanog mailing list archives

Re: list problems?


From: Scott Granados <scott () graphidelix net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT)


I'm not sure, someone who has a degree sometimes shows that they have 
the ability to stick with something long term and complete it.  I 
realize that is an over generalization but it does show something.  On 
the other hand I can think of some good reasons why someone might not 
have a degree but still be totally qualified.
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Avleen 
Vig wrote:


On Wed, 22 May 2002, Andy Dills wrote:

If you ask me, I think that this is analagous to the situation where some
guy gets rejected at a job interview because he "doesn't have a degree",
which is in truth just an excuse.

Actually (without hoping to trigger a flame war), there are a lot of very
large comanies, mainly in the US (mainly in the finanial sector or
eduction sector, and occassionaly in the defense sector), who DO refuse to
hire without a degree.

There are many good technical persons out there who don't have a degree.
There are almost many unemployeed technical persons who would make better
admins / engineers than some people I know who have degrees.

With the current situation, I see the following:
  Proportionally here are more technical people in jobs WITH degrees than
    without
  People with degrees have more experience, and get farther

I believe the latter reason is because more people hire candidates with
degrees. Vicious circle.

Not hiring people who don't hold degrees is fast becoming a policy matter.
The reasons for it are numerous. Very few (IMO) are 'good' reasons.




Current thread: