nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP metrics on WAN links
From: Me <smentzer () mentzer org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:11:29 -0600 (MDT)
I think you missed part of his comment: " of course there are always some "twinking" done regularly to give higher priorities to the higher bandwidth, link condition etc" so fiber mileage is just the base, with modifications to make it work correctly, based on bandwidth, etc. On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Joe Abley wrote:
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:58:50 -0700 From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org> To: Sush Bhattarai <netnews () sush org> Cc: nanog () merit edu, Tom Holbrook <tomhol () corp earthlink net> Subject: Re: IGP metrics on WAN links On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:25:16PM -0400, Sush Bhattarai wrote:Think most ISPs use actual fiber milesThat seems unlikely to me. Do you really want your intra-AS traffic to always follow a short OC3 in preference to a long OC48? Joe
-sean Spoon!
Current thread:
- IGP metrics on WAN links Tom Holbrook (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Sush Bhattarai (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Me (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Joe Abley (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Me (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Joe Abley (Jul 19)
- RE: IGP metrics on WAN links Daniel Golding (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Warren Van Camp (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Sush Bhattarai (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Warren Van Camp (Jul 19)
- RE: IGP metrics on WAN links Frank Scalzo (Jul 19)
- Re: IGP metrics on WAN links Jennifer Rexford (Jul 24)