nanog mailing list archives

RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF


From: Patrick Evans <pre () PRE ORG>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:23:21 +0000 (GMT)


On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, James Smith wrote:

Maybe if we classed them by aggregate provisioned bandwidth, with
a secondary classification that ranks number of peers at the
point...

Hrm. Does that mean I can put a Black Diamond or M160 in a rack and
declare myself a Tier 0 NAP/IXP?

What a silly argument this is :)

-- 
Patrick Evans - teasing the gatso since 1993
                free from the clutches of the law since 8/1/2002
                pre () pre org | www.pre.org | ZXR400L9 | Gibson SG


Current thread: