nanog mailing list archives
RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: James Smith <jsmith () PRESIDIO com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:16:10 -0500
Marketecture. It looks better to call yourself a NAP than to call yourself an IX. The naming of the "type" of exchange is by custom, and not law, AFAIK. Thus, the marketing droids take over. Look at what they have done to "broadband"... Maybe if we classed them by aggregate provisioned bandwidth, with a secondary classification that ranks number of peers at the point... James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE Systems Engineer The Presidio Corporation I speak for myself, even when I shouldn't.
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF David Luyer (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mark Prior (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Patrick Evans (Jan 30)