nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:38:27 -0800
If you recall... NAP's were tiered... 1,2 etc...
no, i do not recall that. perhaps it is hard enough to learn from history without rewriting it. randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Paul Vixie (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Patrick Evans (Jan 30)