Re: zebra/ospf issue

[Josh Gentry <jgentry () swcp com>]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 09:38:01PM -0500, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> > Josh Gentry
> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:38 AM
> > To: nanog () merit edu
> > Subject: zebra/ospf issue
> >
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm experimenting with using Zebra running on a Debian box to
> > do OSPF with
> > the Ciscos on our network.  The zebra box has 2 interfaces, each in a
> > different area.  This is the first time we have tried to impliment
> > multiple areas on our network.  Right now, area 51 consists
> > only of the
> > zebra box and a Cisco 2500, and is just for testing.
> >
> > The zebra box is forming a full adjacency with the Cisco in
> > area 51 with
> > no problems.  It will not, however, become fully adjacent
> > with the DR and
> > BDR in area 0.  This seems to be preventing the distrobution
>
> I think this is normal behavior (without really analyzing things...).
> See if this helps any: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/104/11.html
>
> Mark Radabaugh


It is normal for it to be in 2-way adjacency  with with all the routers in
area 0 _except_ the DR and BDR.  Indeed, my Zebra forms a 2-way adjacency
with all the routers in area 0, except DR and BDR, but it never even makes
it to 2-way adjacency with the DR and BDR, let alone the full adjacency
needed for the Zebra box to receive and inject routes into the OSPF
routing table.

Thanks for the link.  Good info, even though not the answer to this
problem.

Thanks,

Josh
jgentry () swcp com