nanog mailing list archives
Re[3]: Die thread, DIE!)
From: Richard Welty <rwelty () averillpark net>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:13:53 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 02:01:38 -0400 Jim Popovitch <jimpop () rocketship com> wrote:
IMHO, I know of no out-of-the-box MTA that defaults to handle mailinglist loads.
!?!?!?!?
Attached is a graph from yesterday showing the number of running Sendmail processes (green), and the number of emails in mailq (blue).
umm, sendmail had a lot of problems 6-7 years ago, but supposedly has improved. i wouldn't know, i switched to exim back around 1996, and guess what -- in 1996, exim handled mailing list loads well out of the box. i'm talking about 2000-3000 subscriber lists and 25-35 email messages a day. i'm told postfix and qmail do good jobs with mailing lists as well. richard -- Richard Welty rwelty () averillpark net Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592 Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
Current thread:
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!), (continued)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch (Aug 22)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jeffrey Haas (Aug 26)
- Re[3]: Die thread, DIE!) Richard Welty (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 22)