nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!)
From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles () skynet be>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:14:03 +0200
At 12:09 AM +0200 2002/08/22, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I guess that if mail sent to the nanog list wouldnt take 5-60 minutes to get delivered to all people on the list, people would sooner see that someone else has actually answered the email in question, and wont answer themselves.
Show me the headers that demonstrate these delays. On the message I am responding to, I see an end-to-end delay of just a few minutes, and that amount of time could easily be accounted for by your clock being slightly off from mine.
I remember this being discussed earlier, is there any perticular reason why this hasnt been fixed? If nanog-l is supposed to be a list for operational purposes, doesnt that require speedy delivery in a lot of cases?
For more details on the issues involved, read the following: Author: Rob Kolstad Title: Tuning Sendmail for Large Mailing Lists Pages: 195 Publisher: USENIX Proceedings: Eleventh Systems Administration Conference (LISA '97) Date: October 26-31, 1997 Location: San Diego, California Institution: Berkeley Software Design, Inc. Author: Strata Rose Chalup Author: Christine Hogan Author: Greg Kulosa Author: Bryan McDonald Author: Bryan StansellTitle: Drinking from the Fire(walls) Hose: Another Approach to Very Large Mailing Lists
Pages: 317 Publisher: USENIX Proceedings: Twelfth Systems Administration Conference (LISA '98) Date: December 6-11, 1998 Location: Boston, Massachusetts Institution: Global Networking and Computing, Inc. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles () skynet be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Current thread:
- .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Joe Abley (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Pete Ehlke (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Die thread, DIE! -> Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Aug 21)
- mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Chris Adams (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Dave Stewart (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch (Aug 22)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Joe Abley (Aug 21)