nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes)
From: Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:48:00 +0000
When I tell USG how I feel, they seem to ignore me. Your mileage may vary.True enough. But their machines could always be removed from the list of known root servers, and I don't think that there's much they could do about it.
that is absolutely false, in several different ways.
Current thread:
- RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes), (continued)
- RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 06)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bdragon (Aug 06)