nanog mailing list archives

Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 11:17:10 -0400

On Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:48:00 EDT, Derek Samford said:

Please...Let this thread just die.


Well.. if the Routing Nazis were doing their jobs, this thread wouldn't
be necessary. ;)

Godwin. :)

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: RFC 2870's applicability, (continued)
- - - Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Aug 08)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Aug 07)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 09)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk (Aug 09)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush (Aug 09)
    - Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
    - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Aug 06)
    - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Aug 07)
    - RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 07)
    - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 07)
    - RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
    - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Aug 06)
  - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jeff S Wheeler (Aug 06)
  - Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bdragon (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes ril_phosenthal (Aug 07)
  - "... I don't think that means what he thinks it means..." bmanning (Aug 07)