nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 2870's applicability
From: "John M. Brown" <john () chagresventures com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:45:03 -0700
if .../named.boot then {upgrade now} BIND has a "goodness" chunk of code that will check connectivity to the servers and pick a good one, it rechecks as a func of time. is what I have in mine, seems to work well.... john brown chagres technologies, inc ;; ANSWER SECTION: . 6D IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.36.148.17 E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.203.230.10 D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.8.10.90 A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 198.41.0.4 H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.63.2.53 C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.33.4.12 G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.112.36.4 F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.5.5.241 B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.9.0.107 J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 198.41.0.10 K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 193.0.14.129 L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 198.32.64.12 M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 202.12.27.33 On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
What would be useful in all this discussion would be if someone gives a list of "good" root servers to put in my named.boot. i.e. generally fast response time and no blocking prefixes -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes David Conrad (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 06)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)