nanog mailing list archives
Re: bulk email
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:31:32 -0400
In message <4738cuobuatfc6l3hn98n41u2b4fbqflr1 () 4ax com>, Lionel writes:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:53:58 +0100, James Cronin <james () unfortu net> wrote: [opt-in bulk email]Has anyone ever actually come across such a contract in real life or are they just urban myths?Urban myth. If you make damn sure that you clearly mark your bulk mail with the website/organisation at which your user subscibed, & you record the *way* they subscribed[0], you should be fine. It's also vitally important that you respond promptly to email that arrives at your domain's 'abuse@' address. [0] Eg: IP address & time stamp from when they hit the 'subscribe me' button on a web form, copy of the signed paper form they sent in, etc.
See http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/0104/msg00718.html for a NANOG post -- and a link -- on the subject. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb Full text of "Firewalls" book now at http://www.wilyhacker.com
Current thread:
- Re: bulk email, (continued)
- Re: bulk email James Cronin (Apr 22)
- Re: bulk email J.D. Falk (Apr 22)
- Re: bulk email Paul Wouters (Apr 22)
- Re: bulk email gabriel m schuyler (Apr 24)
- Re[2]: bulk email Richard Welty (Apr 22)
- Re: bulk email Kevin Loch (Apr 22)
- RE: bulk email Christian Kuhtz (Apr 23)