nanog mailing list archives

Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)


From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:58:36 +0100




--On Monday, September 24, 2001 7:19 AM -0400 Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:

The loss of something like 60 Hudson shouldn't cause more than
an annoying route flap in your network.

My point being that building a network which doesn't have more
than an annoying route flap, if /both/ 60 Hudson and 111 8th
avenue are lost, is extremely hard (*) (especially if it has
a transatlantic component). And that's true even if you
have your own fiber.

(*) hard means that it isn't compatible with existing topologies,
and building new ones is expensive.

Alex Bligh
Personal Capacity.


Current thread: