nanog mailing list archives
Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy??
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:27:45 -0400
Less than a week ago Cisco TAC recommended DRAM from the Approved Vendor List to me. I hope this is not true.
-Paul At 06:16 AM 10/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Has anybody else received one of these emails? I don't have an issue related to this, but I am concerned that this will drive up the costs of maintaining and improving my infrastructure. -bradly > Going forward, Cisco no longer recommends > the use in our networking products of memory > products sold by third parties. Cisco has therefore > discontinued the "Approved Vendor List" we have > maintained in the past. In the event your company > contacts Cisco with a support issue, and Cisco > determines that the support issue you have reported > is one that arises from your company's use of a third > party memory product, Cisco may, in its discretion, > refuse to provide technical assistance to help > resolve the issue you have identified, whether > such assistance would be provided under a product > warranty or under a support plan such as SmartNet.
Current thread:
- Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Grant A. Kirkwood (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) E.B. Dreger (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Walters (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Paul Timmins (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Rodney Dunn (Oct 12)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Andreas Plesner Jacobsen (Oct 10)