nanog mailing list archives
Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot)
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () gitoyen net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:54:03 +0200
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:58:19AM -0700, Grant A. Kirkwood <grant () virtical net> wrote a message of 18 lines which said:
I'm currently in the process of setting up a new border router, and the recent debate on the above topic got me wondering what the best practice filtering policy is? Is there one?
I'm interested to see if people filter route anouncements on the basis of registered routes in an Internet Routing Registry. In our area (Europe), the RIPE database typically contains less than half of the routes which are actually announced. I assume it is not better in ARINland. On the basis of inetnum objects (network addresses, not routes), it is a bit better in coverage but you cannot use inetnum directly in a comparison, you have to check that a BGP announce *includes* at least one registered inetnum. To summary, I dropped the idea. Does anyone implemented it?
Current thread:
- Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Grant A. Kirkwood (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) E.B. Dreger (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Walters (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Paul Timmins (Oct 12)
- Re: Changed Cisco Memory Policy?? Rodney Dunn (Oct 12)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Rob Thomas (Oct 09)
- Re: Filtering Best Practices, et al (Was Verio Peering, Gordon's Knot) Andreas Plesner Jacobsen (Oct 10)