Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

> > I take it that unless I can point to some specific situation in which some
> > specific application or user community is negatively impacted by this,
> > you'll go on assuming that this deviant behaviour is merely an exercise in
> > creativity.
> The way to go about this is to see if breaking existing practice will break
> current implementations and plausible future implementations.

we call it 'architecture' when we can see it won't work from flaws
in the design.  we call it a stupid mess when we test a broken
design because we lack architectural judgement.

randy