nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 20:33:23 -0700
or any other criteria, then the name for this is: "broken."I suppose you don't do split-horizon DNS, then?
Of course I do. With a NAT or firewall box between the different sets of users so that no DNS data can leak between the deviant worldviews.
Current thread:
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover, (continued)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Christopher A. Woodfield (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Patrick Greenwell (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul A Vixie (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover bert hubert (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover bert hubert (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Patrick Greenwell (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Peter van Dijk (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Stefan Arentz (Oct 06)
- brainstorms (Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover) E.B. Dreger (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 06)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Adam McKenna (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover David Howe (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover David Howe (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Adam McKenna (Oct 07)
- Re: dns based loadbalancing/failover Paul Vixie (Oct 07)