nanog mailing list archives

Re: 214/8 and 215/8


From: smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:42:01 -0800 (PST)



| The full RFC2050 justification for a /7's worth of space would
| be a mighty and wondrous thing to behold.

Indeed, and since 2050 predates the allocation date listed
at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
by a year and a half, I hope such a full justification exists
for what otherwise would be a rather creepy land-grab.

Maybe someone who does FOIAs regularly could start on one,
since nobody seems to have jumped up to justify the two /8s?

        Sean. (studiously avoiding the issue of the IANA institutionalization
               process underway now, which presumably will have a practical
               bearing on such matters...)


Current thread: