nanog mailing list archives
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:12:16 +0000 (UCT)
| These were delegated on the return of nets 49 and 50, along w/ about a | /9 of mixed /16 and /24 space. e.g. an overall reduction in the | amount of space. Jon Postel, as the IANA, approved the transfers. | At that time, ARIN did not have control over legacy delegations. So I seem to be missing something that keeps me from understanding this -- why didn't they just turn off the /9 of mixed /16 and /24 space and keep the two pre-existing historical class-As, which would have more fully followed the BCPs? Sean.
legecy hardware/software. Fully classless kit was just becoming common at the time. (cisco did not support it across the product line) --bill
Current thread:
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8, (continued)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 John Kristoff (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Eliot Lear (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Simon Lyall (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)
- RE: 214/8 and 215/8 Daniel Golding (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Philip Smith (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)