nanog mailing list archives
Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches)
From: Simon Higgs <simon () higgs com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:43:27 -0800
At 01:09 AM 11/22/01 -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
I found an archive of NAMEDROPPERS going back to 1983. If you are interested in the subject, or just want to know how we got here, its an interesting read. Anonymous FTP at ftp://ops.ietf.org/lists/ in 1983, 1984, etc. If you don't know the past, you are doomed to repeat it. Even though I disagree with some of them, I understand some of the decisions a bit better.
There are also some specific mailing lists such as newdom, where Draft Postel was hashed out. Due to various circumstances, the list moved a couple of times. There is an archive here (zip, gz, & mbx format):
http://www.iahc.org/mail-lists.htmlAlso there's the iahc-discuss mailing list, which unfortunately has been censored (between Jan 28, 1997 and May 14, 1997) because of the highly negative response to the IAHC's final report - i.e. the formation of eDNS on the IAHC mailing list:
http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/ One of these days I'll get the shared-tld list archive online. Best Regards, Simon -- (A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network?
Current thread:
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches), (continued)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) measl (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have... bmanning (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Steve Gibbard (Nov 21)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) W.D.McKinney (Nov 22)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Randy Bush (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Joel Baker (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Rich Fulton (Nov 18)