nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches
From: Paul A Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:23:05 -0800
The world isn't black and white, Paul, and attempting to paint is to -- particularly on this topic -- doesn's support your reputation.
rfc1034 and rfc1035 are entirely black-or-white on these matters. that you want to run your own root-like zone is understandable. that you would allow it to be queried outside of your rfc1918 scope is entirely beyond rationality.
And saying "well, those people don't interest me" ain't real productive either.
i'm not interested, but i am certainly entertained.
Current thread:
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches), (continued)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Steve Gibbard (Nov 21)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) W.D.McKinney (Nov 22)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Randy Bush (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Joel Baker (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Rich Fulton (Nov 18)